| 
     
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
    
       |  | The Palace 
      
      
        
          |  This ruined building is situated to the south 
          of the East Arch, and, although it is one of the most interesting 
          edifices in Bosra, it has been barely mentioned by three or four of 
          the travellers who have written descriptions of the ancient city. This 
          is probably due, to the fact that it is almost completely hidden by 
          the modern dwellings that are crowded around and within it. It is 
          plainly visible from only one side, the east, which is the side least 
          likely to be approached by visitors. Here a long wall with two storeys 
          of niches (111. 227) now faces upon a plantation of peach and almond 
          trees; but this garden is enclosed by a wall so high that a view of 
          the Palace is to be had only at intervals where the wall is in need of 
          repairs. The best view of the building is to be had from the roof of 
          the Djami' id-Dabbaghah, from which point one of my photographs (111. 
          228) was taken. This picture, although not very good as a photograph, 
          may serve to show that a considerable part of the ancient structure is 
          still preserved, and to illustrate the crowded condition of the 
          village about it. There are seven families living in the compartments 
          of the Palace, and in crude hovels built within its court; while many 
          sheep, goats, and cattle are stabled in its lower chambers, and other 
          rooms serve for the storing of fodder. It will be observed that the 
          task of extricating the plan of the ancient building from the mass of 
          modern structures is not an easy'' one.The Palace, as it stands, occupies a rectangle of 50 by 33 metres 
          (111. 229), its longer axis lies north and south, its entrance was on 
          the west, the side of the building which is least well preserved. The 
          building was constructed throughout of highly finished quadrated 
          blocks of basalt laid dry. The apartments were grouped on the north 
          and south sides of a large open court, the east side of which was 
          closed by a heavy, unbroken, wall within which was a narrow passage. 
          The west side appears to have consisted of another heavy wall in which 
          the entrance must have been ; for no entrance is visible elsewhere. 
          Colonnades of two storeys were placed upon the north and south sides 
          of the court, and an arcade carried by piers, with a colonnade above 
          it, occupied the east side of the open quadrangle which measured 22 by 
          16 metres. The residential portions of this great edifice consisted of 
          two, three, and four storeys; for there are many cases in which two 
          corbelled storeys are together equal in height to one arched storey; 
          and there appear to have been angle towers that were carried up in a 
          fifth storey. The larger and more important rooms were those on the 
          south side of the court, but the north side contained chambers of 
          dignity and high interior finish. Almost all of the apartments of the 
          ground floor are in a perfect state of preservation, many of them are 
          inhabited, others serve as stables or granaries. Manyof of the rooms 
          of the intermediate and upper floors are likewise inhabited, and rooms 
          in the fourth floor are to be seen in ruins. In the northeast angle a 
          fragment of wall with a window in it suggests a fifth storey in a 
          tower at each angle of the building. Three columns and two half 
          columns engaged with piers are standing on the north side of the 
          court, four of the piers of the arcade on the east side are in place, 
          and the details of the lower colonnade on the south side, and remains 
          of the upper colonnades on all three sides, are to be found in the 
          ruins. With all this material at our disposal it is not difficult to 
          reconstruct the major part of the building.
 In 111. 229 I have given a plan which shows the lower floor of the 
          northern half of the Palace and the upper floor of the southern half. 
          This is partly the result of the fact that some of the apartments 
          could not be satisfactorily measured, the upper ' rooms on the north 
          side being occupied by women, and the lower chambers on the south side 
          being dark and inaccessible, and filled with cattle or straw. But, the 
          upper floor on the one side, or the lower floor on the other, can not 
          be very different in plan from the floor below or' above it in either 
          case. Let us begin our survey of the Palace at the northwest angle 
          where a group of four small rooms lies in a mass of ruins. A piece of 
          wall with an engaged column at one end stands in front of these ruins, 
          and the row of columns extending eastward from it is represented by 
          three shafts and four bases and another half column engaged with a 
          pier. The first complete apartment (K) on this side is well preserved 
          in two storeys and is inhabited. On the ground floor it has two 
          divisions separated by a moulded arch. The outer division has a
 |  
          | 
            
            
              
                |  ceiling of stone slabs carried by a 
                fine corbel course in form of a salient cyma recta, the rear 
                division is covered by a tunnel vault composed of long slabs 
                carried on arches in the form of a salient cyma like that of the 
                outer ceiling (see Section K-L). Above the outer division is 
                another room similar to the one below; but over the vaulted 
                chamber are two low storeys of chambers equal in height to the 
                outer room, in the style often seen in the Southern Haurân in 
                houses which had only one high storey in the outer room. The 
                second  apartment is  |  |  |  
          |  a very large room with a high transverse arch 
          (PL XI, Sect. M-N) carried by piers with carved caps which are shown 
          in Plate XI, and with a salient corbel course carved at the angles, 
          which is shown in the same plate. The arch, as Sections M-N and P-0 
          show, elevated the ceiling above the level of the ceilings of the 
          rooms adjoining it, and above the floor level of the colonnade 
          without, so that it was necessary to provide steps in the thickness of 
          the walls where the doorways were in order to reach the floor of the 
          great chamber above. The great arch, the corbel course, and the steps 
          in the thickness of the doorway in the upper floor in the west wall, 
          are all in place; but the ceiling slabs of the lower chamber have been 
          removed, and the arch of the chamber above has fallen, although its 
          piers are in place. The windows shown in the ground floor in Plate XI, 
          and the lower windows in the upper floor are still to be seen, though 
          walled up ; but the upper windows were supplied from similar windows 
          in another part of the Palace. The apartment adjoining this large 
          chamber on the east is similar on the ground floor to that on the 
          opposite side; but above it there appear to be two low storeys 
          throughout, and both of them are inhabited. This brings us to the 
          angle tower, which had five low storevs, and the small chamber next to 
          it which was four storevs hio;h. The middle part of this side of the 
          Palace is quite similar in plan and arrangement to many of the houses 
          of the better class at Umm idj-Djimal1. The eastern division of the 
          Palace seems to have served only to connect the northern and southern 
          divisions which were the residential quarters. There was a long narrow 
          passage just within the thick east wall, a fine colonnade of two 
          storeys outside the wall, and an arcade upon the court. This part of 
          the interior of the Palace is filled with recently constructed houses 
          which utilize the parts of the ancient building behind the piers of 
          the arcade, and conceal one of the piers completely.' One may find the 
          angle pier of the north end with a half column engaged to one of its 
          faces, three complete piers, and one pier standing at about half its 
          original height. None of the arches is in place; but there are 
          numerous moulded voussoirs lying about that belonged to them. I have 
          taken it for granted that the passage behind the wall of the arcade 
          was as high as the arcade itself (111. 229, Sect. A-B), but I could 
          not see any part of it; and it is quite clear that there were two 
          storeys of low chambers above it. The upper storey colonnade (PI. XI, 
          P-O) I have restored from an angle pier with two engaged columns, and 
          from fragments of an order smaller than that of the lower colonnades.The exterior colonnade shown in Restoration I-J (111. '229) w,as drawn 
          entirely from fallen fragments; although the wall behind it, with its 
          two storeys of niches, and its sockets for the cross beams of the 
          intermediate floor, is well preserved, as may be seen in 111. 227. The 
          niches are alternately semicircular and rectangular in plan in both 
          storeys, and alternately arched and square topped; arched niches 
          appear above
 |  
          |  |  
          | rectangular ones and vice versa. The sixth niche 
          from the south end and the fifth from the north end are now both 
          pierced through for doorways; I could not tell if the openings were 
          original. All of the fragments used in the Restoration were found in 
          the ruins and in walls of modern houses at the southeast and south of 
          the Palace. There are two orders, on two different scales; the 
          capitals of the larger order are of the plainest Doric type; those of 
          the upper order have a necking and an astragal. . The fragments of the 
          triglyphal frieze appear to belong to the upper rather than to the 
          lower order. The parapet was suggested by fragments in marble lying in 
          front of the east wall, and was restored from sections of a marble 
          parapet which still serves its purpose upon the roof of the minaret of 
          the Djâmi' Fâtmeh. The statues shown in the niches are of course 
          imaginary. The southern division of the building is the 
          portion of the ruin that gives it the name of Palace. Here the 
          important feature of the upper floor is a large apartment which is a 
          sort of triconchos, having an entrance on the north, large apses to 
          the east and west, and a deep rectangular recess to the south, all 
          three opening upon the central square by large arches. In the angles 
          between the recess and the apses are square chambers with doorways 
          opening upon the recess. I was unable to discover the entire 
          ground-plan of the lower storey of this part of the structure; but I 
          could see that there were four great transverse arches which carry the 
          solid stone floor of the central square of the triconchos (PI. XII, 
          Sect. C.-D.); and it is probable that there were curved walls under 
          the apse walls above. The space between the triconchos and the east 
          wall of the Palace is occupied by a large arched apartment in two 
          storeys, with two small chambers opening out of each to the south. 
          These have one corbelled storey corresponding to the lower arched 
          storey, and two low corbelled storeys corresponding to the upper 
          arched room (111. 229 Sect. G-H). To the west of the triconchos is an 
          open loggia with its two columns and one half column still standing. 
          There are three windows and a doorway in the western apsis which open 
          upon this loggia. South of the loggia is a square chamber in the 
          southwest angle-tower of the Palace. The greater part of this 
          important south wing of the Palace is well preserved, though it is 
          very difficult to see it properly among the modern constructions; the 
          half domes of the apses and all three arches of the triconchos have 
          fallen; but their piers are still in place. The east apsis has been 
          walled up and provided with a flat roof, and, with the room adjoining 
          it on the south, is now used as a residence. The room adjoining the 
          west apse and the room next to the loggia form another modern house. 
          All the lower storey of this part is used for storing chopped straw. 
          The windows of the upper storey are all preserved, and may be seen 
          with their shade-stones above them in the view of the south wall shown 
          in 111. 228; but the third storey of rooms over the row of small 
          chambers on the south side of this wing is in ruins, only the 
          intercommunicating doorways and the window sills remain to prqve that 
          this third storey existed. Even the sills of the upper row of windows 
          in the south arm of the triconchos are still to be seen. The 
          two-storey colonnade which I have restored on the court side of this 
          wing (PI. XII, Sect. E-F) is drawn entirely from a pier at the west 
          end in the lower storey which is still in place, from sockets in the 
          wall which secured the ends of roof timbers, and from fragments of 
          columns of two orders.The plan of this south wing is sufficiently like that of the central 
          part of the Palace at Kasr Ibn Wardan to have been its direct 
          prototype, as may be seen by comparing this plan (111. 229) with that 
          of the other1. It will also be found interesting to compare the plan 
          of this Palace with that of the great ecclesiastical residence behind 
          the Cathedral, which I have called the Episcopal Palace. These two 
          examples, - the one at Kasr Ibn Wardan and the Bishop's Palace — 
          belong, the first certainly, the other probably, to the sixth century; 
          the building before us appears to be a much earlier structure. All the 
          details, like the pier-cap and the corbel course shown in Plate XI, 
          resemble the earliest work of the Roman period in the Hauran, and is 
          not unlike late examples of Nabataean work; for the ornaments shown in 
          the meander pattern of the pier-cap include the crescent moon and the 
          wine jar which may be taken as symbols of Allat and Dushara. The 
          fragments of the minor order of the colonnades are almost exactly 
          similar to the details of the order of the colonnade at. the top of 
          the cavea of the Theatre which is certainly a building of the best 
          Roman period in Syria. The ruin was referred to by the natives as Der 
          Deradjan, i. e. the "Cloister of Trajan". It would be extremely 
          interesting if inscriptions or other proofs should later be found to 
          show that this was indeed a palace built by the first Roman governor 
          of Arabia in the name of the Roman emperor; for, in its style and 
          construction, there is nothing to prevent us from assigning the 
          building to that period.
 |    |